… FNAF theory… just, just FNAF theory.

Soooo yeah, I kinda swore myself back in April or early May
to give up FNAF’s hold on my life, cause quite honestly this community (THAT I
MYSELF TAKE PART IN) is killing me. The never ending story, fanboys who will
stick to calling this the best game ever TO THE VERY END, anti-FNAF youtube
comments by obvious trolls that get over a hundred replies everytime… and
DeviantART… WITHOUT THE ADULT CONTENT FILTER. I did stay away from it, didn’t
even see the trailer for the game like what, a WEEK before this fourth
installment came out? But when the 4^th game was released as early as
the 2^nd, and my good ol buddy Markiplier posted his video, I came
back.

I ALWAYS COME BACK.

People already cracked this game open, only took a day and a
half tops, so now, me putting all my faith in hopes Scott is truly human and
this is truly the final chapter, before a movie(and dlc apparantly….. why am I doing this)… here is
my final thread, before putting this all behind me again.

Are you expecting a theory? One final epic backstory to the entire franchise? No. Cause Fnaf 4 isn't done yet. And THAT is something to bring attention to. Here is the story of FNAF 4's addition to our bigger story.

First we have this kid, who I’m just gonna call Billy. Billy
loved the characters from the Fredbear series, but when he first saw his
favorite toys portrayed as disturbing robots in the pizzeria, he hated it. His
own friends began to terrify him, and his own big brother started taking
advantage of him for this. He began wearing a mask of Foxy to hide and scare
the poor toddler, and while their parents were gone at work or some other
place, they would leave their kids at Fredbear’s Family Diner as daycare. Billy
would hide under tables, scared out of his mind, seeing the animatronics and
people in suits as monsters out to get him. Everyone began teasing him for
this, and Billy’s brother even got his friends in the act to scare him.

One day Billy and his brother went to a birthday party, and
Billy’s brother and his friends got their masks on and grabbed Billy, bringing
him closer to the Fredbear animatronic, but they brought him too close and he
got his head bitten down. Ladies and gentlemen, this was the infamous bite of
1987… wait, this game didn’t take place in ‘87!!!

Now that we have the main story out of the way, let’s look
at some easter eggs and secrets revealing more of the plot. First of all, 1983.
In one of the minigames playing out the story of Billy, the one where Billy
returns home to his room from Fredbear’s Diner, where he gets scared again by
his brother. You find out when this game took place by approaching the tv upon
entering your house. After standing there long enough the tv turns on, showing
a commercial for Fredbear’s Family Diner, 1983! Don’t ask me why the commercial
specifies the year it is… cause I honestly have no flubbing clue, I never said
FNAF has no holes. It’s like a big chunk of swiss, and Scott Cawthon keeps
trying to fill in the holes with squeezy cheese.

Here’s where things become confusing, why on earth would the
bite take place in 83 when phone guy states in the first game there was a bite
of 87? Were there two bites? Is the phone guy just stating incorrect facts?
Well to take a look at this, we need proof from the other games to back this
up… just, give me one second…

*3 hours of rummaging through the FNAF wiki later…*

THIS MAKES NO FRAGGIN SENSE!!!!

Everything up until now contradicts the bite of 1983!!!
First of all, 1983 wasn’t even a THING until FNAF 4 and all accounts support
this ISN’T the bite of 87! First proof, the phone guy.

“They used to be able to walk around during the day too, but
then there was the bite of 87…”

And we know FNAF 2 takes place in November of
1987, specifically the week of 11/07/87 - 11/13/87. This is the new location,
and we know that earlier that year there wasn’t a bite because the animatronics
are still able to walk around in free-roaming mode during the day. And in FNAF
2, we see that FredBear a.k.a. Golden Freddy has been scrapped for the newer
Freddy model. And since the 2^nd game’s location went down due to
malfunctioning robots, the next location in the first game not giving the
robots free-roaming until night, we can assume that this was the specific
moment in time when we had the bite of 87. SO WHERE IN THE HOLY NAME OF
ENRAGEMENT CHILDREN DID THE BITE OF 83 COME FROM!?

Well like I said, FNAF isn't put to rest yet, not even close. This may be the game's "final chapter", but it A.) Isn't even finished as DLC is being released on halloween (AKA September 7th) and, well, if Nicolas Cage isn't the purple guy in the movie I'm out.

BUT I saw this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMJ2jZtW7cw got released by Game Theory. FNAF 4 got it ALL WRONG! Guess he knew about the whole 83 ordeal after al- nope, people without their frontal lobe don't experience fear. Well then :l

Wait... you know what that means? I STILL BEAT GAME THEORY TO THE PUNCH!!!

MatPat would be so proud. :')

So I would be lying if I said I understood 5% of what you're talking about here, but hey, it was entertaining anyway. lol Now to sit back and see if Scott finds a way to tie up the loose ends. I mean surely he of all people wouldn't confuse the dates '83 and '87 (though I contend that '87 was far too magical of a year for anything so horrific to happen in it, but whatever).

Anyway, way to sniff around and find apparent errors. I like this kind of thing because it shows that people are paying attention instead of just numbing their brains with a controller/keyboard, and proves that true gamers are not ignorant time wasters in a fantasy world, but thinkers who can appreciate a true masterpiece and art.

Now here's the funny thing. Your entire post beat Mattpat's video on every point. Because, while you respected a game's existence. And took the events of said game into account to make a hypothesis about it. MatPat's video on FNAF 4 could be summed up to "This game makes no sense! It ruins my headcanon! This entire game just doesn't work!"

And even funnier, Scott himself called out Mattpat on that video.

http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/999/144/ffb.png


Also, good job on your theory, dude. And way to confirm you put more thought into your theory than MatPat this time too. #NicolasCage4PurpleGuy

A user of this : Yeah, I honestly thought that MattPat rushed this video in order to beat Scott Cawthon. I thought that it was the Bite of '87, but the comments convinced me so much that I just didn't think it was anymore. However, MattPat said something about a "lore video" of FNAF 4.

I agree wholeheartedly ! I am a frequent stalker for the fnaf subreddit and someone brought up videos made by TheIronMango on you tube. He explains some of what you said!
I think the game theorists were so disappointed at the fact that the feedback they were getting from the other FNAF theories was mostly people saying they were being too "nice" on the whole game. So they tried to be more critical, and now just made a video talking about the science behind missing a frontal lobe. They completely missed the fact that you can clearly see the boy's head was completely crushed my golden Freddy / Fredbear (?) in the mini game, as well as the Easter egg on the TV, along with the possibility you may not even be playing as the victim, rather the victims brother..