Here's the link to our Fantasy League:

http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/84315

Current Teams Team Name - Vizzed Username

The Permaban Champ (legacyme3) - Banned
The Maniacs (megamanmaniac)
The Lion Hearted (Seishiro Leonhart)
Vizzeteers (Davideo7)
Crimson Alchemists (pacman1755)
STL Vizzed (mlb789)
Armed Schaubbery (Jordanv78)
Skeletor22 (skeletor22)
Silly Chinese Llamas (mrfe)
Eli's Grenade Toss (danno202)
Team V (virus16)
Team Doom (satanklaw)
School House Block (Oldschool41)
Destroyers O.O (Elegardo)
suxfuns (soxfan849)
Hard Kore Insanity - (lilwildwolf21)
4th and 20 Run Plays (lorddeox)
TehP0is0nPlayer - (p0is0n)

If you aren't listed here or need me to update your team info, please let me know.

Although I have dealt for a QB I still have a lot of depth at WR so if someone wants to deal, feel free to send me a trade or two.


Good luck on the season everyone!

Oldschool41 : What positions are you looking for if someone was to offer you a deal for Cleveland's defense?

Jordanv78 : A QB would be my preferred choice as I'm not high on Tannenhill as my QB plus I need a bench QB (would take Gabbert, but I'm not desperate.) A TE would also work if your willing to take Eifert (I think he's a good TE, I just didn't see much of how he was used in Cincy's offense).

Pretty much make me an offer and I'll think it over.

I have Weeden, but you may not like to trade for him.
I also have Tim Tebow, so you have to give me the best offer for him.  He's about as coveted as, say, a Tyrod Taylor.
RG3 is out of the question.  I'm not insane.
I have the Cardinals D, but I would need your D and an extra piece for one of my bench players to trade away Patrick Peterson.
Any WR not named Julio Jones or AJ Green are on the block as well.  I would also be okay with moving Mark Ingram with a lower quality WR for a lower quality RB and a good WR (I obviously love the WR position more than any other).
I wonder if this year instead of Taylor-Peterson I can get Tebow-Peterson.

Aw, totally missed any form of notification about the live draft. I was out at a open house last night though, so I wouldn't have made it anyway. :/

I'm not particularly pleased with my lineup, but that's what I get for being absent. lol. Seriously, I'll trade almost any of my players. I'm obviously short at the QB department (Roethlisberger isn't exactly the best QB imo...), so I'm looking for a better QB.

mrfe : Same here. Try to make an offer to team V as he has both Rivers and Bradford for bench QBs.

Edit: Forget about my need for QBs this early as I'm taking Jeff Tuel as my back up QB...for now. Figure he would be a better QB against the Pats D then Tannenhill against the Cleveland D (who I've yet to decide if I want to start that D or Buccs D at Jets).

Oldschool41 : Yeah that's a bad spot. Tannenhill is on the road and Tuel at home but I wouldn't have much faith in an undrafted free agent rookie starting a game against the Pats in the opener...Even if he is at home, but who knows. He could surprise everyone.

I figure the Bills will be handing the ball off a lot and calling a lot of short pass routes.

Everyone please veto the trade between me and Vizzeteers. I didn't mean to accept it. I wasn't paying attention.

Oldschool41 : I'm pretty sure the trade already got the amount of votes needed to veto the trade. So I think we are all good.

Yeah I didn't get the trade for Tebow either. Even if he hadn't been cut, he wasn't going to get any playing time that would be a fantasy factor anytime soon anyways.

Jordanv78 :   When I saw that David offered that trade, I instantly accepted it.  Trading my joke draft pick for a starting TE is a great thing .

mlb789 : Yeah I understand from your perspective although I'm wondering when he's going to be ready. Since there's limited news about him and he just got activated off the PUP list earlier this month. Either way, I guess it's good to get something from a player that's not even on an active roster.

Davideo7 : I guess that gamble didn't pay off too well, unless the trade were to be vetoed.

mlb789 : Is Stocker even that good? I would have?taken Crabtree off waivers if I wanted a Tampa Bay TE (thou he is injured).

megamanmaniac :  Good trade. I didn't like Rice that much.

Oldschool41 : I think it was a good trade. I got a great RB in Rice, and you got a good defense and a decent W/T. Hopefully nothing goes wrong.

megamanmaniac : I don't think anything will go wrong. I think I'm getting to raw end of the deal with hoping that McFadden will stay healthy, but I trust McFadden staying healthy then Rice against those Run D.

Oldschool1: Reverse applies to me, so I guess its ok. It was a bit of a stretch for me to give up New England AND Miles Austin considering my eeak W/T rotation, but my RB base is slightly stronger. I just hope that Chicago can perform the way they did the 1st half of last year all season long.

Also, I'm willing to give Chicago away for a great RB and a mediocre DEF or for a couple of good W/T and a mediocre DEF.

Finally, what do we do with 4th and 20? I sent him a trade request and he never accepted or declined. Should he be kicked so that we have 17 teams? I dont want another Raveniz in the league.

Oldschool41 : You wouldn't shop around your top pick that much? With their current offensive scheme and the fact that they lost a go to reciever in their offense I would look for rice to get more touches. Surprised you gave him up when you aren't getting any proven players back in return. I would have thought you would have held out for a better QB in a trade at least. Who do you view as the best performer out of the group that you traded for?

I would have required Brady back in return.

megamanmaniac : Pitta probably isn't returning until week 9 at the earliest.

Jordanv78 : Yeah I know. But frankly, I can't afford to lose the few not so bad W/T I have, since my W/Y rotation is one of the worst in the league. Besides, if Pitta comes back as good as he did last year after he had a concussion, then he culd be a valuable asset later in the season.

As for trading Brady, I probably wouldn't, unless I get a high quality QB and a good RB or a high quality QB and 1 or 2 W/T in return. Brady is too valuable for me to give away, especially since I don't have a back up QB at my disposal.

Jordanv78 : I was kind of looking around at some trade options, but I was pretty sure that I wouldn't get another QB without giving up Rice, either Thomas or Garcon, and one of my defenses (most likely Tampa). I can't really afford to give away my best 2 WRs as they play in weak Pass Defenses (particularly Thomas) as besides those 2 I don't have much WR depth (I'm taking a big risk with Thompson and Dobson).

I would say that the Patriots D is the better performer out of my trade guys. They play in a weaker division (I trust the Pats D against the Jets, Bills, and Fins then Tampa D against Panthers, Saints, and Falcons), I lose a defense that may or may not be better with Revis coming off injury, and the Linebacking core is better then Tampa Bays.

But of course the league could always void the trade and I can request that the league cancel it. But I think I'm okay.