someone plz tell me who came first? chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg chicken egg no no no it is the cow

It was totally the chicken.
If it wasn't for the chicken, nothing would have incubated the egg.

Originally posted by BigBob85

---

It was totally the chicken.
If it wasn't for the chicken, nothing would have incubated the egg.

---

Yes, but then how would a chicken get there. Besides both of those answers are wrong.
God came first.

He wasnt in the poll though.
God made the chicken, that laid the egg, and incubated it.
If God made the egg first, it wouldn't have been naturally incubated and never developed, simple as that.

It makes sense that the chicken came first. When god created adam, the first man, did he get created as a baby? No.

So if the question was asked, what came first, the baby or the man, it was the man.

Yeah, thats so true. So there you are, defiantly, the chicken came first.

on like the 6 day i think god made all animals but he might of made them a eggs?

See as it doesn't say He made the eggs on the 6th day, then it was the chicken.

http://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=egg&qs_version=9
Thats the NKJ search for egg. Not many useful results.

Genisis 1:24-31 is everything that happened on the 6th day.

the poll was ment to be funny... or the chicken came first

I don't even need to say it's the cow.
It's just so obvious.
Jk, it's the chicken.

It has to be the chicken, or what else would have incubated the egg? ehh.. ehh??

well if god made everything. then he could of made the egg already incubated. after mary was a virgin when she had jesus. if god is involved anything is possible.

Being a firm believer of Darwin, evolution, natural selection and the like I have to answer egg.

Egg makes more sense if you believe in evolution.

Dragon is wrong because evolution itself makes no sense. Thanks for coming out though.

no, evolution makes perfect sense as if it didn't, it wouldn't be widely accepted as the truth. i believe in evolution so based on the representation of the saying i'd say the egg. literally, the chicken came before the chicken egg.

Ziggy: there are plenty of things that have been widely accepted as truth that have been proven to be wrong so your reasoning falls apart.

Thanks for the attempt though

same goes for god then. widely acepted as truth.
could be proven wrong just like evolution could

the egg came first, because the chickens mother was a crossbreed between the Red and the Grey Junglefowl

Could be if you could actually come up with evidence that could disprove the existence of God. As far as I'm concerned that only comes when you die. I find there is more evidence for the existence of God than against Him.

And I must ask these questions if evolution makes so much sense....

1. How do you get organic matter from inorganic? (ie, protiens, bacteria etc from rocks, mud etc) Simply put it's not possible. It has been attempted and the results were tiny protiens produced into toxic environments that would have been unfit for survival.

2. Show me evidence that shows mutations creating new life forms instead of creating a life form that is no longer viable when compared to the original animal. Mutations are not positive changes but results of a breakdown of genetic information. There is no genetic information produced as a result of mutation, just a degredation of old information.

3. How would a lifeform without gender evolve into 2 genders simultaneously?

4. There is also the problem of evolving complex body functions and systems at the same time (a simple example is bat sonar or the development of flight). Let's look at the flight example. In order to fly the forearms of the animal would have had to evolve over several generations into wings. These intermediate animals would have not made sense evolutionarily (is that a word?). They would have awkward forearms that would serve very little purpose until the ability to fly was developed. In short these animals would not survive long.

I guess that's enough for now.

Originally posted by geeogree

---

Ziggy: there are plenty of things that have been widely accepted as truth that have been proven to be wrong so your reasoning falls apart.

Thanks for the attempt though

---

like creationism? yeah, there's a good example. believing in evolution doesn't mean not believing in G-d. it just means that every living thing evolved from a simpler form



1. so what, you don't believe in the atom theory either?
2. mutations don't necessarily mean growing an inactive third arm. mutations can be caused by codon shifts so the code would be altered and different from that of any parents. you might want to check up on your biology
3. mutations, that's why it has taken billions of years
4. chickens have wings, but can't fly