Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Remove Ad, Sign Up
Register to Remove Ad
Register to Remove Ad
Signup for Free!
-More Features-
-Far Less Ads-
About   Users   Help
Users & Guests Online
On Page: 1
Directory: 1 & 43
Entire Site: 6 & 1686
05-23-24 01:07 PM

94 Posts Found by Raveman

Guests get no special search functionality

12-01-12 08:15 PM
| ID: 695894 | 34 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 94/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Dude, that's freaking awesome. I wonder what retro games and systems they'll have in stock when they start selling retro game stuff. Does anyone know when they're going to start selling retro gaming stuff?
Dude, that's freaking awesome. I wonder what retro games and systems they'll have in stock when they start selling retro game stuff. Does anyone know when they're going to start selling retro gaming stuff?
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

06-01-12 07:16 AM
| ID: 593167 | 82 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 93/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

I would be in a place with hills and some mountains to climb. Higher up, better view, hard for zombies to get up and I can knock them down with a stick if they somehow manage to get up. I can climb to the top, collect rain water when it runs down the mountain, have some food with me (as much as I can have) and have some Molotovs with me. As a weapon, a knife taped and super-glued to a stick. 
I would be in a place with hills and some mountains to climb. Higher up, better view, hard for zombies to get up and I can knock them down with a stick if they somehow manage to get up. I can climb to the top, collect rain water when it runs down the mountain, have some food with me (as much as I can have) and have some Molotovs with me. As a weapon, a knife taped and super-glued to a stick. 
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-25-12 05:39 PM
| ID: 589727 | 492 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 92/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Twin974 : But I thought Obama was Christian? His mom was Christian, his dad a Muslim. He took on the Christianity religion, because Muslims, like some other religions, don't believe in supporting unnecessary killing. It is a common misconception to believe that Muslims kill everyone who isn't Muslim. That is not true. If it were, many people would be dead. I actually have read the Qu'ran, Bible and other Holy books to develop an understanding for religions before I make accusations against one's religion. Islam supports peace and acceptance of other people's religion, and ensure them that they and their property are safe from hate crimes. If you say you have read this from somewhere, it is without a doubt a false translation, or Farrukism (maybe Fannukism, one of those). I am not sure about the rest of Islam, but I learned a good amount of each religion to understand things as they really are; not based on what I hear. I want proof, so I get it. I know people who are Muslim, and they haven't killed me. In fact, they're my best friends. They don't care what race I am, be it black, white, Asian, Caucasian, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Australian or whatever. They're still my best friends, ever. They're trustworthy and honest. I'm not saying all religious people are like this, as there are malicious corrupt people in the world; some being dictators who use religion falsely as an excuse for their wrongdoings. I doubt Obama would try to get rid of the Cross, seeing as that would make him lose votes in his Presidential Election. People will like him less. I heard that he opened up and said he supports gay rights, which means he is trying to get more people to see him as an 'everyone is equal' guy. People will see him as positive and vote for him; because he supports them (referring to people, gay, straight, whatever who support Obama). Now, I'm not a big political guy or whatever, I choose not to vote knowing that if the President I voted for was actually bad, then it would be partially my fault for getting him to power by voting for him. Anyway, overall what I'm saying is Obama hasn't really said what his religion is, so I assume it is Christian, because he ate pork (I think. Muslims and Jewish people don't eat pork, I'm not sure about the latter.) Islam was the newest compared to Judaism and Christianity. I don't try to take sides on religion because there could be arguments and debates over them, which I don't want to get into. All I want is for everyone to actually understand each other's religion so that racism doesn't thrive, so that prejudice doesn't thrive, and e.t.c. I try to have my reasoning be as true and legitimate as possible, so that no false ideas erupt. I'll look in on that Human Genome Project thing now.
Twin974 : But I thought Obama was Christian? His mom was Christian, his dad a Muslim. He took on the Christianity religion, because Muslims, like some other religions, don't believe in supporting unnecessary killing. It is a common misconception to believe that Muslims kill everyone who isn't Muslim. That is not true. If it were, many people would be dead. I actually have read the Qu'ran, Bible and other Holy books to develop an understanding for religions before I make accusations against one's religion. Islam supports peace and acceptance of other people's religion, and ensure them that they and their property are safe from hate crimes. If you say you have read this from somewhere, it is without a doubt a false translation, or Farrukism (maybe Fannukism, one of those). I am not sure about the rest of Islam, but I learned a good amount of each religion to understand things as they really are; not based on what I hear. I want proof, so I get it. I know people who are Muslim, and they haven't killed me. In fact, they're my best friends. They don't care what race I am, be it black, white, Asian, Caucasian, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Australian or whatever. They're still my best friends, ever. They're trustworthy and honest. I'm not saying all religious people are like this, as there are malicious corrupt people in the world; some being dictators who use religion falsely as an excuse for their wrongdoings. I doubt Obama would try to get rid of the Cross, seeing as that would make him lose votes in his Presidential Election. People will like him less. I heard that he opened up and said he supports gay rights, which means he is trying to get more people to see him as an 'everyone is equal' guy. People will see him as positive and vote for him; because he supports them (referring to people, gay, straight, whatever who support Obama). Now, I'm not a big political guy or whatever, I choose not to vote knowing that if the President I voted for was actually bad, then it would be partially my fault for getting him to power by voting for him. Anyway, overall what I'm saying is Obama hasn't really said what his religion is, so I assume it is Christian, because he ate pork (I think. Muslims and Jewish people don't eat pork, I'm not sure about the latter.) Islam was the newest compared to Judaism and Christianity. I don't try to take sides on religion because there could be arguments and debates over them, which I don't want to get into. All I want is for everyone to actually understand each other's religion so that racism doesn't thrive, so that prejudice doesn't thrive, and e.t.c. I try to have my reasoning be as true and legitimate as possible, so that no false ideas erupt. I'll look in on that Human Genome Project thing now.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-24-12 09:20 PM
| ID: 589331 | 342 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 91/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

What a dumb thing to do. If America is truly anti-communist and believes in freedom, they wouldn't even make this device to be used for civilians. I can guess that people would leave America if they wanted to keep their religious beliefs. Other countries might view this as a communist take over on America. It's a really stupid thing for America to do; I should expect that people who want to keep their religious beliefs or disagree with this product being used on civilians would protest against this or leave the country. Also, having the chip inserted into the hand? That sucks...a lot. This chip device thing is like a new lead that shows that in the future, maybe humans will get chips in their brains that enhances their memory, or replace vulnerable body parts. Then this would be a new 'sub-species' evolving from the human race. The Cyborgs.

Now, I am not sure about this part of 'mark of the beast' originating from the Bible. However, I disagree with this part because I thought religions were against [permanent] tatooes, body piercings and other stuff that's unnecessary.

If I were told to wear that chip, forget about it. It's not worth having something violate your privacy further; as if it isn't violated enough. Seriously? Having a locator in the chip? Just use the cameras that are probably everywhere to see where someone's going. Anything that's bought is recorded, sent to the government and such. I don't get why such a dumb move would be made by a country that believes in freedom for everyone. But really, what can you expect? Nothing is perfect [of this earth]. I would bail (ditch) if they told me to wear that chip. If I get caught, I'm not going to wear that chip voluntarily. But, however, if they let people keep their faiths AND wear the chip, then I would put it into some consideration. At the very least, the chip should be optional; it shouldn't be such a communist move in a super power country.
What a dumb thing to do. If America is truly anti-communist and believes in freedom, they wouldn't even make this device to be used for civilians. I can guess that people would leave America if they wanted to keep their religious beliefs. Other countries might view this as a communist take over on America. It's a really stupid thing for America to do; I should expect that people who want to keep their religious beliefs or disagree with this product being used on civilians would protest against this or leave the country. Also, having the chip inserted into the hand? That sucks...a lot. This chip device thing is like a new lead that shows that in the future, maybe humans will get chips in their brains that enhances their memory, or replace vulnerable body parts. Then this would be a new 'sub-species' evolving from the human race. The Cyborgs.

Now, I am not sure about this part of 'mark of the beast' originating from the Bible. However, I disagree with this part because I thought religions were against [permanent] tatooes, body piercings and other stuff that's unnecessary.

If I were told to wear that chip, forget about it. It's not worth having something violate your privacy further; as if it isn't violated enough. Seriously? Having a locator in the chip? Just use the cameras that are probably everywhere to see where someone's going. Anything that's bought is recorded, sent to the government and such. I don't get why such a dumb move would be made by a country that believes in freedom for everyone. But really, what can you expect? Nothing is perfect [of this earth]. I would bail (ditch) if they told me to wear that chip. If I get caught, I'm not going to wear that chip voluntarily. But, however, if they let people keep their faiths AND wear the chip, then I would put it into some consideration. At the very least, the chip should be optional; it shouldn't be such a communist move in a super power country.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-23-12 06:17 PM
| ID: 588823 | 439 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 90/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

rcarter2 : Jesus was Jewish. Didn't I say I respect everyone else's ideas and ways of living as long as they don't treat me like crap or don't say crap to me? Yeah, I did. And I don't target other religions. Having a different religion is not against my particular religion. Also, straight people DO get in relationships, how do you not know that? I don't think you guys are reading my posts properly. You're hunting and pecking for things that stand out. I said that gays should be away from religious places. Yes, I did. You have no idea what religion I am, or if I take sides at all in religion. Whether I believe in the Divine and that I choose to worship it my way or that I assimilate into a religion. Don't say things that don't make sense to the whole post of mine. It's more than just one person who is anti-gay, so really, it's not only me. And, also, gay people are much different than straight people. They do not have 'feelings' for the opposite gender. They are 'homo' and not 'hetero.' That is a big difference. Right now, rcarter, you accuse me of being a hypocrite. Because I don't think the same as you. That's like saying gays are hypocrites because they think differently from straight people. I thought you were supporting gays? And no, I am not a reader of the Bible. I can be Jewish, I can be Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, or whatever; agnostic, atheist, pretending I have a religion, so don't you accuse me of being something I am not, be it I am that yes or no, whether you know it or not. I am an anti-gay, that's it.
Dragon51777:
Jumping off of a bridge doesn't always mean you will die. You might not drown, you could be bungie jumping, you could be jumping off of a two-foot bridge and whatnot. Also, how can you say religion is wrong and science is right? Majority of science is theory. How did EXISTENCE start? How did Infinite start? There is a God, one TRUE God, whether you believe it or not. It is YOU who is wrong. You didn't even bother reading any of those books from any religion. Only the Bible. Then you assume they all believe with the same thing. Sure, they have same base roots, but it isn't all word-for-word same. You say that they are wrong, when you have no evidence whatsoever, when you don't understand their faith and when you don't even bother to understand it. 

Lay off, everyone, I'm done with this pointless argument.
rcarter2 : Jesus was Jewish. Didn't I say I respect everyone else's ideas and ways of living as long as they don't treat me like crap or don't say crap to me? Yeah, I did. And I don't target other religions. Having a different religion is not against my particular religion. Also, straight people DO get in relationships, how do you not know that? I don't think you guys are reading my posts properly. You're hunting and pecking for things that stand out. I said that gays should be away from religious places. Yes, I did. You have no idea what religion I am, or if I take sides at all in religion. Whether I believe in the Divine and that I choose to worship it my way or that I assimilate into a religion. Don't say things that don't make sense to the whole post of mine. It's more than just one person who is anti-gay, so really, it's not only me. And, also, gay people are much different than straight people. They do not have 'feelings' for the opposite gender. They are 'homo' and not 'hetero.' That is a big difference. Right now, rcarter, you accuse me of being a hypocrite. Because I don't think the same as you. That's like saying gays are hypocrites because they think differently from straight people. I thought you were supporting gays? And no, I am not a reader of the Bible. I can be Jewish, I can be Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, or whatever; agnostic, atheist, pretending I have a religion, so don't you accuse me of being something I am not, be it I am that yes or no, whether you know it or not. I am an anti-gay, that's it.
Dragon51777:
Jumping off of a bridge doesn't always mean you will die. You might not drown, you could be bungie jumping, you could be jumping off of a two-foot bridge and whatnot. Also, how can you say religion is wrong and science is right? Majority of science is theory. How did EXISTENCE start? How did Infinite start? There is a God, one TRUE God, whether you believe it or not. It is YOU who is wrong. You didn't even bother reading any of those books from any religion. Only the Bible. Then you assume they all believe with the same thing. Sure, they have same base roots, but it isn't all word-for-word same. You say that they are wrong, when you have no evidence whatsoever, when you don't understand their faith and when you don't even bother to understand it. 

Lay off, everyone, I'm done with this pointless argument.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-23-12 05:43 PM
| ID: 588810 | 245 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 89/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

If you got your wish for a zombie apocalypse granted, you will eventually die. You didn't even think it through. 500 survivors, most untrained civilians, all stuck in an APOCALYSPE. They will be killing each other for food, sicknesses will break out, there's no place to stay, you are forced to keep on moving. Then you run out of food. You run out of medicine. That's the end of the line, Klutch. Mayhem will break out; remember, this is an apocalypse. No laws, no rules. It's a Free For All. Every Man/Woman for themselves. You kill or be killed. This will be the point where humans show that they are descendants of animals by killing each other. Mass murder. You think this is fun? Don't even expect to live. Just don't. No human is invincible; people fail to acknowledge that fact. You wouldn't have fun at all. Do you think, 500 survivors, can win, against a world of zombies? No. If you're in a stronghold or a castle the zombies will bash their rotten fists against the wall until the rock/brick forming the wall cracks apart and gives way. Then, remember, there is limited ammunition, food, medicine and combat-ready survivors. People die, and asking for a zombie apocalypse is like asking for your own funeral...where you don't get buried.

Also, DrunkenFox; there is no such thing as a perfect human. That wish cannot be granted because it is not within the powers of any genie. 
If you got your wish for a zombie apocalypse granted, you will eventually die. You didn't even think it through. 500 survivors, most untrained civilians, all stuck in an APOCALYSPE. They will be killing each other for food, sicknesses will break out, there's no place to stay, you are forced to keep on moving. Then you run out of food. You run out of medicine. That's the end of the line, Klutch. Mayhem will break out; remember, this is an apocalypse. No laws, no rules. It's a Free For All. Every Man/Woman for themselves. You kill or be killed. This will be the point where humans show that they are descendants of animals by killing each other. Mass murder. You think this is fun? Don't even expect to live. Just don't. No human is invincible; people fail to acknowledge that fact. You wouldn't have fun at all. Do you think, 500 survivors, can win, against a world of zombies? No. If you're in a stronghold or a castle the zombies will bash their rotten fists against the wall until the rock/brick forming the wall cracks apart and gives way. Then, remember, there is limited ammunition, food, medicine and combat-ready survivors. People die, and asking for a zombie apocalypse is like asking for your own funeral...where you don't get buried.

Also, DrunkenFox; there is no such thing as a perfect human. That wish cannot be granted because it is not within the powers of any genie. 
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-18-12 02:32 PM
| ID: 586567 | 663 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 88/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

No, it does not make someone unpatriotic. You find that guy and tell him he's a load of feces, and tell him good, okay? When he said, "You don't deserve to be called an american," it's good in this case because shame has been brought to the term 'american.' People have abused the term 'american,' and saying that they are perfect and that they don't make mistakes and are excellent and have everything. What lies. So. Freaking. Fake. No one, ever, is perfect. Humans were made imperfect. Now, patriotism can also lead to racism. How? Assume that a tourist from Australia comes to the United States. He is sight-seeing and taking pictures and tries some of the food. He coughs a bit while eating and assume he says, "This food tastes a bit weird." And a kind of 'loud and proud shove it in your face' american patriotic guy hears it and says, "Hey! **** you, american food is the best!" Then that over-patriotic guy might think, 'Darn Australians are losers with their dumb outback accents.' This will lead to the guy hating Australians. So, it's best to be normal, neutral, and in the middle. No human is perfect; everyone comes from different places. Don't devote yourself aimlessly just because you are told you are trash because you didn't join a war. War is not the answer. War leads to unnecessary killing. War can lead to extreme prejudice and racism. War can lead to destruction of the environment, harming people physically and mentally (PTSD, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other problems). I once had a debate with someone and I said, "Some people are extremely racist and want to kill people because of their ethnicity and / or religion." The people I was referring to were people in the military who wanted to kill everybody of that religion, saying that they must kill all of their kind and even wipe out civilian populations. In response, the person I was talking to said that the guy had Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and said that it was making him think those bad things. (I'm not going to go into detail about what he was mad about). And I said, "No, PTSD does not cause Racism. Racism is an excuse for being scared of something ( a concept, religion, e.t.c) and showing anger towards it, thinking that it is the problem (because they don't understand it). I have this quote that described it well. 

"Because they’re afraid of things they don’t understand. They are afraid to confront the way they feel. Subconsciously, they know they are wrong...but they just can’t face that fact. This makes them angry. And since they will never take that anger out on the real problem (their ignorance), they take it out on what they perceive is the problem..."

So, if anyone calls you unpatriotic, just ignore it. It doesn't mean like you should die for your country; because you only get being a hero post-death, so you feel no fame or recognition. Just ignore people who say you're stupid because you didn't want to die, or kill people, or see people dying; there's plenty of that even inside a country. Protests, crime, violence, shoot-outs, murder, this all happens on home-grounds. That's why there's the police to deal with that problem (however, that's another story.) In conclusion, it's not like you have to die to be a true hero. You can be a hero by aiming for peace all over the world; you can do things better than having to end someone's life because they are scared and confused about what's going on. Civilians, even those who are armed, die because they were in a war zone trying to protect them self or their family. There is lots of unjust things that happen all over the world; so don't believe it when someone says that you're an unpatriotic loser because you chose a peaceful path. I hope this post helped you with your question.
No, it does not make someone unpatriotic. You find that guy and tell him he's a load of feces, and tell him good, okay? When he said, "You don't deserve to be called an american," it's good in this case because shame has been brought to the term 'american.' People have abused the term 'american,' and saying that they are perfect and that they don't make mistakes and are excellent and have everything. What lies. So. Freaking. Fake. No one, ever, is perfect. Humans were made imperfect. Now, patriotism can also lead to racism. How? Assume that a tourist from Australia comes to the United States. He is sight-seeing and taking pictures and tries some of the food. He coughs a bit while eating and assume he says, "This food tastes a bit weird." And a kind of 'loud and proud shove it in your face' american patriotic guy hears it and says, "Hey! **** you, american food is the best!" Then that over-patriotic guy might think, 'Darn Australians are losers with their dumb outback accents.' This will lead to the guy hating Australians. So, it's best to be normal, neutral, and in the middle. No human is perfect; everyone comes from different places. Don't devote yourself aimlessly just because you are told you are trash because you didn't join a war. War is not the answer. War leads to unnecessary killing. War can lead to extreme prejudice and racism. War can lead to destruction of the environment, harming people physically and mentally (PTSD, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other problems). I once had a debate with someone and I said, "Some people are extremely racist and want to kill people because of their ethnicity and / or religion." The people I was referring to were people in the military who wanted to kill everybody of that religion, saying that they must kill all of their kind and even wipe out civilian populations. In response, the person I was talking to said that the guy had Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and said that it was making him think those bad things. (I'm not going to go into detail about what he was mad about). And I said, "No, PTSD does not cause Racism. Racism is an excuse for being scared of something ( a concept, religion, e.t.c) and showing anger towards it, thinking that it is the problem (because they don't understand it). I have this quote that described it well. 

"Because they’re afraid of things they don’t understand. They are afraid to confront the way they feel. Subconsciously, they know they are wrong...but they just can’t face that fact. This makes them angry. And since they will never take that anger out on the real problem (their ignorance), they take it out on what they perceive is the problem..."

So, if anyone calls you unpatriotic, just ignore it. It doesn't mean like you should die for your country; because you only get being a hero post-death, so you feel no fame or recognition. Just ignore people who say you're stupid because you didn't want to die, or kill people, or see people dying; there's plenty of that even inside a country. Protests, crime, violence, shoot-outs, murder, this all happens on home-grounds. That's why there's the police to deal with that problem (however, that's another story.) In conclusion, it's not like you have to die to be a true hero. You can be a hero by aiming for peace all over the world; you can do things better than having to end someone's life because they are scared and confused about what's going on. Civilians, even those who are armed, die because they were in a war zone trying to protect them self or their family. There is lots of unjust things that happen all over the world; so don't believe it when someone says that you're an unpatriotic loser because you chose a peaceful path. I hope this post helped you with your question.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-18-12 01:53 PM
| ID: 586558 | 116 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 87/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

soxfan849 : I avoid gays because it is against my religion, and I don't want an argument over religion and gays and all that stuff. It's annoying and I avoid it. If the person who's gay has done something for me, I just acknowledge that; but it doesn't mean I have to be with them all my life. I won't be like, "Ew, you're gay, get away from me. I'm leaving." I try my best to be nice with people. I don't say crap to other people unless they treat me bad or say something bad about me or to me. If I found out my friend is gay I just wouldn't be around him as much.
soxfan849 : I avoid gays because it is against my religion, and I don't want an argument over religion and gays and all that stuff. It's annoying and I avoid it. If the person who's gay has done something for me, I just acknowledge that; but it doesn't mean I have to be with them all my life. I won't be like, "Ew, you're gay, get away from me. I'm leaving." I try my best to be nice with people. I don't say crap to other people unless they treat me bad or say something bad about me or to me. If I found out my friend is gay I just wouldn't be around him as much.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-18-12 01:46 PM
| ID: 586557 | 552 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 86/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

It's a decision with the top four that I have used before. Those four are Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Google Chrome. I am going to talk about some of the things these four browsers feature and then vote them based on my opinion.

Internet Explorer: 
You're standard browser that you start with (if you are a PC [Computer] user.) It's efficient and gets the job done. Homepages for this browser can be changed but are usually seen as MSN, Yahoo, Bing, or Microsoft homepage. This works well if you are just surfing the web, checking your e-mail, playing a simple game, or going on social chat sites and stuff. Very easy to use; The tools icon is quickly accessible at the top right corner. Can be assumed as the best browser if you are a PC user, because this is already installed and ready for quick use. Simple layout. Some sites can be viewed best with this browser. Has frequent updates. 

Firefox Mozilla: 
Sometimes the standard browser on a Mac, but very, very slow. Like Internet Explorer, this browser can also view a page best. However, it appears and feels very slow when using it. The layout is a bit sluggish and dull; fat boxes for tabs and usually has a homepage set to Firefox Google Search or what you set it to. The layout can be changed with Firefox skins for personalizing it. Tools accessed at the top right (same as IE) and has some updates as well. Not the most popular browser from what I have heard and seen.

Google Chrome:
Wow! Google has their own browser! Yeah, it's been up for more than a year, I think. Google Chrome is said to be the best browser for usage (again, from what I have heard and seen.) It's fast and efficient, but isn't  a standard browser set up on a PC or a Mac. Google Chrome is downloaded from the internet, and is therefore sometimes considered not trusted. Google Chrome displays site ratings based on popular vote, has the tools icon on the upper right corner, fast performance which is good for just surfing the web, playing games (including those from Chrome Store or Apps), using social networks or whatever it is you do. This browser is good for your all-around usage, like Internet Explorer. However, there is a downside to this browser. Sometimes Google Chrome can freeze, crash, and end up having to 'kill' pages. Very simple to use and has a feature of pinning tabs, bookmarking sites, having Google search in the URL bar (like auto-complete where it searches for things you might be looking for) and has site names listed as well, so you don't have to type in the whole thing. Made to be very convenient. 

Safari: 
Very rarely talked about; is a Mac's other standard browser. It is similar to Internet Explorer with the layout, but instead has a gray color. Simple but efficient; it has many characteristics like Internet Explorer. 

And now for the list: 

1. First place: Tied with Google Chrome and Internet Explorer. 
2. Second place: Firefox
3. Third place: Safari

You might not agree with this post or how I chose the list, but Safari and Firefox I haven't used in a while so they might not be as accurate. 






It's a decision with the top four that I have used before. Those four are Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Google Chrome. I am going to talk about some of the things these four browsers feature and then vote them based on my opinion.

Internet Explorer: 
You're standard browser that you start with (if you are a PC [Computer] user.) It's efficient and gets the job done. Homepages for this browser can be changed but are usually seen as MSN, Yahoo, Bing, or Microsoft homepage. This works well if you are just surfing the web, checking your e-mail, playing a simple game, or going on social chat sites and stuff. Very easy to use; The tools icon is quickly accessible at the top right corner. Can be assumed as the best browser if you are a PC user, because this is already installed and ready for quick use. Simple layout. Some sites can be viewed best with this browser. Has frequent updates. 

Firefox Mozilla: 
Sometimes the standard browser on a Mac, but very, very slow. Like Internet Explorer, this browser can also view a page best. However, it appears and feels very slow when using it. The layout is a bit sluggish and dull; fat boxes for tabs and usually has a homepage set to Firefox Google Search or what you set it to. The layout can be changed with Firefox skins for personalizing it. Tools accessed at the top right (same as IE) and has some updates as well. Not the most popular browser from what I have heard and seen.

Google Chrome:
Wow! Google has their own browser! Yeah, it's been up for more than a year, I think. Google Chrome is said to be the best browser for usage (again, from what I have heard and seen.) It's fast and efficient, but isn't  a standard browser set up on a PC or a Mac. Google Chrome is downloaded from the internet, and is therefore sometimes considered not trusted. Google Chrome displays site ratings based on popular vote, has the tools icon on the upper right corner, fast performance which is good for just surfing the web, playing games (including those from Chrome Store or Apps), using social networks or whatever it is you do. This browser is good for your all-around usage, like Internet Explorer. However, there is a downside to this browser. Sometimes Google Chrome can freeze, crash, and end up having to 'kill' pages. Very simple to use and has a feature of pinning tabs, bookmarking sites, having Google search in the URL bar (like auto-complete where it searches for things you might be looking for) and has site names listed as well, so you don't have to type in the whole thing. Made to be very convenient. 

Safari: 
Very rarely talked about; is a Mac's other standard browser. It is similar to Internet Explorer with the layout, but instead has a gray color. Simple but efficient; it has many characteristics like Internet Explorer. 

And now for the list: 

1. First place: Tied with Google Chrome and Internet Explorer. 
2. Second place: Firefox
3. Third place: Safari

You might not agree with this post or how I chose the list, but Safari and Firefox I haven't used in a while so they might not be as accurate. 






Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-18-12 01:19 PM
| ID: 586548 | 94 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 85/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

soxfan849 : Don't know what that last sentence means, but I can assure you I think I know what it means. I avoid gay people. Fine, call me scared, but I'm not. It's my opinion. At the very least keep gays out of places where religion is widespread, and away from people who are anti-gay, so there is no problem that starts up. Anyway, if I did have a close friend who was gay and had a crush on me, I would avoid them. Let them think what they think; I'm not their friend anymore.
soxfan849 : Don't know what that last sentence means, but I can assure you I think I know what it means. I avoid gay people. Fine, call me scared, but I'm not. It's my opinion. At the very least keep gays out of places where religion is widespread, and away from people who are anti-gay, so there is no problem that starts up. Anyway, if I did have a close friend who was gay and had a crush on me, I would avoid them. Let them think what they think; I'm not their friend anymore.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-18-12 01:12 PM
| ID: 586545 | 621 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 84/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Hmm, there's a lot of ways to prevent cyber bullying. I'll list a few and share what I think of it.
1. If you are on a social network (e.g, Facebook, Myspace, Twitter or whatever), most should have the option to 'block' someone. If not, just ignore them and delete the messages without reading them.
2. If it's bullying via e-mail, most should allow you to block the person messaging you.
3. If it's bullying via phone, you should be able to block them as well. 
4. Don't use the internet for social reasons. 
5. Keep your accounts private to yourself or people whom you allow to view your profile (Family, Trusted friends, contacts).
6. Ignore it. 
7. Some chats allow you to 'mute' other people so that even if they say something, you won't be able to see it. 

What I think about cyber-bullying is that there are many ways to prevent it, but it should be a criminal offense (on certain grounds). People have been depressed and went all emo and stuff, thinking that the world was against them and that they can't do anything about it. Numerous cases have been reported about people committing suicide because of cyber-bullying and real-life bullying. Here's the thing; not everyone is alike. Some people are more sensitive and their feelings are hurt more. Others get used to taking crap and hold grudges quietly, stalking their predator and taking matters into their own hands. This usually leads to killing the bullies which has also happened before. Bullying is hard to get rid of; but it can be stopped. Some people ignore bullying altogether; but it's the more sensitive people who are having the worst results. Cyber-bullying can be done with numerous people; all ganging up and targeting one person. It is a group of united bullies; all against not-united individuals. Cyber-bullying has to be put to an end; not because it's annoying, but because matters can be manipulated into one's own hands do do something about the problem. 

Now, below are some reports I have read about bullying and cyber-bullying. I'm not sure if the second one is real, but the first one is.

A student in middle-school who loved to play violent video-games was being cyber-bullied by people he knew in real life, and one day decided that he had enough. He didn't tell anyone about the problem and took matters into his own hands. He took his father's pistol and killed three people (who were the bullies.) When they were questioning him, they asked him 'How could you kill so easily?' He replied, 'I do it everyday.' That guy had been so engulfed by the virtual game world, that the fear of taking a life was no more. This was real. 

A student in high-school around sixteen years old was being bullied and he told the principal about this. The principal lied and said he talked with the bullies and their parents, but the bullying went on. The student talked with his parents and they spoke with the bullies; but it still went on. He told the teacher, and the teacher gave the bullies a month of detention or some sort of punishment, but it went on. He told the principal again; only the bullying just went on. And he was enraged. So what he did is, he takes his dad's hunting shotgun and shows up on the bus. He approaches the bullies and shoots them all in the heart; making the bullies scream and cry and grovel for their life before he killed each of them. Then later, he guns down the principal. He knew the principal was lying. I'm not sure if this was real but it seems legit.
Hmm, there's a lot of ways to prevent cyber bullying. I'll list a few and share what I think of it.
1. If you are on a social network (e.g, Facebook, Myspace, Twitter or whatever), most should have the option to 'block' someone. If not, just ignore them and delete the messages without reading them.
2. If it's bullying via e-mail, most should allow you to block the person messaging you.
3. If it's bullying via phone, you should be able to block them as well. 
4. Don't use the internet for social reasons. 
5. Keep your accounts private to yourself or people whom you allow to view your profile (Family, Trusted friends, contacts).
6. Ignore it. 
7. Some chats allow you to 'mute' other people so that even if they say something, you won't be able to see it. 

What I think about cyber-bullying is that there are many ways to prevent it, but it should be a criminal offense (on certain grounds). People have been depressed and went all emo and stuff, thinking that the world was against them and that they can't do anything about it. Numerous cases have been reported about people committing suicide because of cyber-bullying and real-life bullying. Here's the thing; not everyone is alike. Some people are more sensitive and their feelings are hurt more. Others get used to taking crap and hold grudges quietly, stalking their predator and taking matters into their own hands. This usually leads to killing the bullies which has also happened before. Bullying is hard to get rid of; but it can be stopped. Some people ignore bullying altogether; but it's the more sensitive people who are having the worst results. Cyber-bullying can be done with numerous people; all ganging up and targeting one person. It is a group of united bullies; all against not-united individuals. Cyber-bullying has to be put to an end; not because it's annoying, but because matters can be manipulated into one's own hands do do something about the problem. 

Now, below are some reports I have read about bullying and cyber-bullying. I'm not sure if the second one is real, but the first one is.

A student in middle-school who loved to play violent video-games was being cyber-bullied by people he knew in real life, and one day decided that he had enough. He didn't tell anyone about the problem and took matters into his own hands. He took his father's pistol and killed three people (who were the bullies.) When they were questioning him, they asked him 'How could you kill so easily?' He replied, 'I do it everyday.' That guy had been so engulfed by the virtual game world, that the fear of taking a life was no more. This was real. 

A student in high-school around sixteen years old was being bullied and he told the principal about this. The principal lied and said he talked with the bullies and their parents, but the bullying went on. The student talked with his parents and they spoke with the bullies; but it still went on. He told the teacher, and the teacher gave the bullies a month of detention or some sort of punishment, but it went on. He told the principal again; only the bullying just went on. And he was enraged. So what he did is, he takes his dad's hunting shotgun and shows up on the bus. He approaches the bullies and shoots them all in the heart; making the bullies scream and cry and grovel for their life before he killed each of them. Then later, he guns down the principal. He knew the principal was lying. I'm not sure if this was real but it seems legit.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-18-12 12:41 PM
| ID: 586535 | 0 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 83/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-16-12 08:00 PM
| ID: 585919 | 38 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 82/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Although there are many I can think of, it's probably TB for online; Army Men: Operation Green for Game Boy Advance (works for Nintendo DS and Game Boy Advance SP). That's all I can think of for now.
Although there are many I can think of, it's probably TB for online; Army Men: Operation Green for Game Boy Advance (works for Nintendo DS and Game Boy Advance SP). That's all I can think of for now.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-15-12 07:13 AM
| ID: 585347 | 15 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 81/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330


Flibbith :
Glad to know I'm a comedian...I guess. I wasn't really angry; just more disappointed.

Flibbith :
Glad to know I'm a comedian...I guess. I wasn't really angry; just more disappointed.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-14-12 05:47 PM
| ID: 585207 | 306 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 80/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Klutch : (This reply also goes to the person/people who also wished for a zombie apocalypse). Wishing for a zombie apocalypse means that EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD IS DEVASTATED. That's right. Back to reality, kids. You said, APOCALYPSE. A war lost by humanity to our resurrected dead. That means you are most likely dead, dying, or infected. The same things go to your friends and family (and pets, maybe...if you have them). This is a truly devastating disaster where the only way for humanity to survive is to wait out the zombies until they ALL ROT TO DEATH. You CANNOT be expecting that as soon as this disaster happens, that you can pick up everything you need as you go or right away. What I am saying is a matter of IDEALISM VERSUS REALISM. Do you really expect the average family with a high-school student to own a gun? To have supplies stocked out just in case? No. You have disappointingly underestimated the big picture. Wishing for a zombie apocalypse is like wishing for people to die so you can kill their dead corpse; all for the sake of your selfish fun. A human corpse, one that has been buried for maybe even two or three days, cannot be a zombie. Why? BECAUSE in order for the infection to spread through the human body (from a zombie bite or from contact with a fluid from a zombie to an open wound, eyes, nose, or mouth), the body needs a flowing bloodstream that can carry the infection to the brain. Then there will be the transformation process from human to zombie. At the very least, Klutch, you could have just wished for a ZOMBIE OUTBREAK. There is a day and night difference, so really, just get it right so that there isn't this kind of drag in understanding. 
Klutch : (This reply also goes to the person/people who also wished for a zombie apocalypse). Wishing for a zombie apocalypse means that EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD IS DEVASTATED. That's right. Back to reality, kids. You said, APOCALYPSE. A war lost by humanity to our resurrected dead. That means you are most likely dead, dying, or infected. The same things go to your friends and family (and pets, maybe...if you have them). This is a truly devastating disaster where the only way for humanity to survive is to wait out the zombies until they ALL ROT TO DEATH. You CANNOT be expecting that as soon as this disaster happens, that you can pick up everything you need as you go or right away. What I am saying is a matter of IDEALISM VERSUS REALISM. Do you really expect the average family with a high-school student to own a gun? To have supplies stocked out just in case? No. You have disappointingly underestimated the big picture. Wishing for a zombie apocalypse is like wishing for people to die so you can kill their dead corpse; all for the sake of your selfish fun. A human corpse, one that has been buried for maybe even two or three days, cannot be a zombie. Why? BECAUSE in order for the infection to spread through the human body (from a zombie bite or from contact with a fluid from a zombie to an open wound, eyes, nose, or mouth), the body needs a flowing bloodstream that can carry the infection to the brain. Then there will be the transformation process from human to zombie. At the very least, Klutch, you could have just wished for a ZOMBIE OUTBREAK. There is a day and night difference, so really, just get it right so that there isn't this kind of drag in understanding. 
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-13-12 04:34 PM
| ID: 584805 | 66 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 79/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Hmm... a classic question. 

1. I would wish for super intelligence. (I'm not going to wish for strength because strength is best and more respected if you actually worked hard to earn them).
2. A better awesome-paying job (which I can't be force-retired, laid-off or fired from) It should be fairly easy.
3. Immunity to diseases and infections.
4. (Joke) More genies to grant me wishes!
Hmm... a classic question. 

1. I would wish for super intelligence. (I'm not going to wish for strength because strength is best and more respected if you actually worked hard to earn them).
2. A better awesome-paying job (which I can't be force-retired, laid-off or fired from) It should be fairly easy.
3. Immunity to diseases and infections.
4. (Joke) More genies to grant me wishes!
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-13-12 03:47 PM
| ID: 584788 | 51 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 78/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Big Mac Attack : Ha Ha, thanks man. I did my best on this review, especially because it was my first. Thanks for the credit, Big Mac. Also, thanks to you too, Fat Batt. I put effort into it so that the final product was well detailed and as helpful as possible. 
Big Mac Attack : Ha Ha, thanks man. I did my best on this review, especially because it was my first. Thanks for the credit, Big Mac. Also, thanks to you too, Fat Batt. I put effort into it so that the final product was well detailed and as helpful as possible. 
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-13-12 03:43 PM
| ID: 584787 | 74 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 77/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

I would call the Poison Control or 911 and get immediate medical help.  But I would also be panicking, which I guess is normal...right?

If I caught a missingno Pokemon, I would store it in my PC because I already have an awesome team formed. 

If you were confronted by police officers who were about to arrest you (and you can't fight back and hit them), and you were innocent, what would you do?
I would call the Poison Control or 911 and get immediate medical help.  But I would also be panicking, which I guess is normal...right?

If I caught a missingno Pokemon, I would store it in my PC because I already have an awesome team formed. 

If you were confronted by police officers who were about to arrest you (and you can't fight back and hit them), and you were innocent, what would you do?
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-13-12 09:08 AM
| ID: 584640 | 692 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 76/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330

Likes: 1  Dislikes: 0
Overall Rating: 9.5
This game was amazing! It is a great game to play (especially for fun). This game is fun and addicting; you'll most likely be hooked to it for sure! Once you get the hang of controls and such, you'll be having a blast of a time! I have fun playing it during spare time (and free time). This game is certainly not the average shooter you'd expect. In general, this game is an excellent pocket game. It's fun and gives the awesome feeling of opening fire at the enemy (which were the Tans in this game). I love to play Army Men: Operation Green  in my spare time.
Graphics Rating: 8
The graphics were great, especially for it's time when it was made (2001). 3DO Company did a good job adding improvements to the game, and it certainly showed well! This game was fun to play and is also good for young(er) game players. The graphics weren't as bland as the original Army Men (which was for Game Boy Color. It was also a good game, as well) and had more detail brought into it. The graphics showed more of the surroundings and character rather than a simple green stick figure and one-patterned ground. Various building designs have been made, more detailed enemies and allies, better boat and vehicle designs. Great improvements.  
Sound Rating: 9
The sound quality was excellent. Though it could be better with the improvements of the gun fire sounds, it was overall great. When the enemies threw bombs and the X's appeared to show where the bombs would land, the sound of a bomb falling could be heard as the standard high-pitched scree until it hit the ground and exploded. Made with a solid amount of accuracy shown. The gun shots sound a bit realistic, but when you rapidly fire the gun it sounds fake.
Addicting level: 10
This game was very addicting. It brought out the fun of a pocket-game and is combined with the awesome feeling of shooting up enemies! Throwing grenades was made easier by simply hitting 'X' and getting the distance right. This game allows you to ride different vehicles (depending on which mission you are on) and you can blow up enemies, turrets, vehicles, enemy sniper towers, buildings and more! Also, it's funny to see that when your character is walking/running while facing North (or where his back is turned to the player), he looks like he is dancing. But he looks like that when he walks anyway. Or it could be described as a fat hopping chicken.
Story Rating 7
The story was good, but it didn't go far into detail. The story line seemed to be based off of World War II, the campaign you start at represents 'D-Day.' The story was usually described in mission debriefing, about one or two paragraphs before you started the mission. 
Depth Rating: 8
There are fifteen missions total in the game, and each take a while to complete. It's not like you shoot a few enemies and you beat the mission. This is good because you get to use more firepower throughout the game. However, some missions are made longer because you might get lost very easily if you are a beginner. The game has a lot to offer; fifteen missions, the experience of having fun shooting plastic enemies and more! This game isn't one of those boring ten-minute game that just kills time and isn't fun. It's something you want to play again, because it isn't just for time killing.
Difficulty: 5
The controls are very easy to learn; from starter to advanced player. However, it does not mean that this game is as easy as following arrows around to get to your destination while and after taking down your enemies. The difficulty comes from location. You can get lost very easily, especially because their are no arrows or markers telling you where to go. It's hard to memorize where to go, where you have been and if your objective is near or far from you. That is what I believe is the only difficulty; finding out where to go. 
Overall Rating: 9.5
This game was amazing! It is a great game to play (especially for fun). This game is fun and addicting; you'll most likely be hooked to it for sure! Once you get the hang of controls and such, you'll be having a blast of a time! I have fun playing it during spare time (and free time). This game is certainly not the average shooter you'd expect. In general, this game is an excellent pocket game. It's fun and gives the awesome feeling of opening fire at the enemy (which were the Tans in this game). I love to play Army Men: Operation Green  in my spare time.
Graphics Rating: 8
The graphics were great, especially for it's time when it was made (2001). 3DO Company did a good job adding improvements to the game, and it certainly showed well! This game was fun to play and is also good for young(er) game players. The graphics weren't as bland as the original Army Men (which was for Game Boy Color. It was also a good game, as well) and had more detail brought into it. The graphics showed more of the surroundings and character rather than a simple green stick figure and one-patterned ground. Various building designs have been made, more detailed enemies and allies, better boat and vehicle designs. Great improvements.  
Sound Rating: 9
The sound quality was excellent. Though it could be better with the improvements of the gun fire sounds, it was overall great. When the enemies threw bombs and the X's appeared to show where the bombs would land, the sound of a bomb falling could be heard as the standard high-pitched scree until it hit the ground and exploded. Made with a solid amount of accuracy shown. The gun shots sound a bit realistic, but when you rapidly fire the gun it sounds fake.
Addicting level: 10
This game was very addicting. It brought out the fun of a pocket-game and is combined with the awesome feeling of shooting up enemies! Throwing grenades was made easier by simply hitting 'X' and getting the distance right. This game allows you to ride different vehicles (depending on which mission you are on) and you can blow up enemies, turrets, vehicles, enemy sniper towers, buildings and more! Also, it's funny to see that when your character is walking/running while facing North (or where his back is turned to the player), he looks like he is dancing. But he looks like that when he walks anyway. Or it could be described as a fat hopping chicken.
Story Rating 7
The story was good, but it didn't go far into detail. The story line seemed to be based off of World War II, the campaign you start at represents 'D-Day.' The story was usually described in mission debriefing, about one or two paragraphs before you started the mission. 
Depth Rating: 8
There are fifteen missions total in the game, and each take a while to complete. It's not like you shoot a few enemies and you beat the mission. This is good because you get to use more firepower throughout the game. However, some missions are made longer because you might get lost very easily if you are a beginner. The game has a lot to offer; fifteen missions, the experience of having fun shooting plastic enemies and more! This game isn't one of those boring ten-minute game that just kills time and isn't fun. It's something you want to play again, because it isn't just for time killing.
Difficulty: 5
The controls are very easy to learn; from starter to advanced player. However, it does not mean that this game is as easy as following arrows around to get to your destination while and after taking down your enemies. The difficulty comes from location. You can get lost very easily, especially because their are no arrows or markers telling you where to go. It's hard to memorize where to go, where you have been and if your objective is near or far from you. That is what I believe is the only difficulty; finding out where to go. 
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

05-10-12 07:22 AM
| ID: 583329 | 37 Words

Raveman
Level: 23


POSTS: 75/94
POST EXP: 11514
LVL EXP: 60601
CP: 47.0
VIZ: 330


SmobblePants :
You forgot to mention how to get past Batman, Spiderman and Superman? Really? It wasn't only the maximum-defence thing. Besides, they're made to withstand earthquakes and tornadoes. You just freaking ruined it with your false assumptions.

SmobblePants :
You forgot to mention how to get past Batman, Spiderman and Superman? Really? It wasn't only the maximum-defence thing. Besides, they're made to withstand earthquakes and tornadoes. You just freaking ruined it with your false assumptions.
Member
Tactical FacePalm


Affected by 'Laziness Syndrome'

Registered: 04-14-12
Last Post: 4190 days
Last Active: 2941 days

Links

Page Comments


This page has no comments

Adblocker detected!

Vizzed.com is very expensive to keep alive! The Ads pay for the servers.

Vizzed has 3 TB worth of games and 1 TB worth of music.  This site is free to use but the ads barely pay for the monthly server fees.  If too many more people use ad block, the site cannot survive.

We prioritize the community over the site profits.  This is why we avoid using annoying (but high paying) ads like most other sites which include popups, obnoxious sounds and animations, malware, and other forms of intrusiveness.  We'll do our part to never resort to these types of ads, please do your part by helping support this site by adding Vizzed.com to your ad blocking whitelist.

×